Support H-Net | Buy Books Here | Help Support the NBN and NBN en Español on Patreon | Visit New Books Network en Español!
If you look up the word "secular" in just about about any English-language dictionary, you'll find that the word denotes, among other things, something that is not religious. This "not-religious-ness" would seem to be the modern essence of the word. If a government is secular, it can't be religious. If a court is secular, it can't be religious. If a party is secular, it can't be religious.
But, as Todd H. Weir points out in his fascinating book Secularism and Religion in Nineteenth-Century Germany: The Rise of the Fourth Confession (Cambridge University Press, 2014), the origins of what we might call "secularism"--the faith with no faith--were profoundly religious. To understand how this could be so, Weir takes us back to an age and place--the nineteenth-century German Lands--in which belonging to a church was a matter of state. The question then and there wasn't whether you were going to adhere to a faith, but which one. Yet, in the wake of the Enlightenment, there were those who did not want to belong to one of the "established" (as in "establishment clause") religions. They--"dissenters"--were seeking their own path to God and they petitioned the state to allow them to do so. Sometimes the lords of the land (and often heads of the church) granted this wish; sometimes they didn't. Sometimes they did, reversed themselves, and then reversed themselves again. Given the novelty of "free religion" and "free thinking," it was hard to know what to do. In any case, the back and forth between officials and religious dissenters opened a space--narrow at first and then gradually widening--in which the faithful could be not only different but, well, not very faithful at all. Listen in.
Marshall Poe is the founder and editor of the New Books Network. He can be reached at marshallpoe@newbooksnetwork.com.